Thank god I downloaded the trial version and didn’t purchase the upgrade.
Aperture 3 provides over 200 improvements. Notably, Faces and Places have been called up from iPhoto. While my photography doesn’t lend itself to Faces, Places is important. It took me a little while to figure out how to use Places, but once I did, it was easy to geotag my images.
Unfortunately the location data was not included when I uploaded photos to Flickr using the new Flickr uploader.
The Flickr uploader is a treat. It forces you to place images into a set. It gives you the option of setting the size of the photos as “Web Images”, “Optimized Images” and “Actual Size Images”. It doesn’t explain what this means.
I think that I could understand this behavior in iPhoto, but this is Apple’s Pro-level photo software. Don’t you think the user might have a better idea of how they want to present their images online than Apple?
All Apple had to do was purchase the exceptionally fine FlickrExport plugin and add its capabilities. But no, Aperture 3 comes with its own marginally useful uploader (hopefully the plugin will still work - I haven’t tried that).
The new brushes are helpful. I also like the full screen browser (and the fact that full screen mode doesn’t black out your extra monitor).
But I am left wondering if this upgrade is worth it. Does it really provide enough enhancements to cover the upgrade costs?
I am not sure, I am going to have to play with it a bit more. But my initial reaction isn’t good. I don’t see that the upgrade is that much better than what I have with Aperture 2 and plugins. I would have thought that Apple should have come up with something superior.